Context: Regarding the relationship between the size of the pharynx and several sagittal skeletal malocclusions and patterns of growth, contradictory findings have been documented. Aims: The intent of this research was to analyze the size of the pharynx in various sagittal malocclusions and growth patterns in the Nepalese population. Settings and Design: An analytic cross-sectional research was undertaken on patients who attended the Orthodontics Division of BPKIHS. Materials and Methods: A total of 135 patients’ lateral cephalometric radiographs were gathered. Medians and interquartile ranges of pharyngeal widths according to McNamara airway analysis and Arnett/Gunson FAB airway analysis adapted by Santiago et al. in different skeletal malocclusions and growth patterns were compared. Results: There was not any discernible statistically noteworthy variation within the upper pharynx size, lower pharyngeal width, nasopharyngeal width (WNP), oropharyngeal width, hypopharyngeal width (WHP), and deep pharyngeal width (WDP) in different skeletal malocclusions. A statistically significant variation was discovered in nasopharyngeal size (P = 0.010), hypopharyngeal size (P = 0.027), and deep pharyngeal size (P < 0.001) in various patterns of growth, i.e. hypodivergent versus normodivergent, and in hypodivergent versus hyperdivergent, not in normodivergent versus hyperdivergent group of patients. Conclusion: There was not anything statistically noteworthy variation in the pharyngeal widths of the participants with respect to the various skeletal malocclusions. WNP, WHP, and WDP showed a statistically significant variation between hypodivergent versus normodivergent and hypodivergent versus hyperdivergent growth patterns.

Abstract Context: Patient satisfaction gives important insight into the patient’s expectations and perceptions of the quality of service. There have not been many studies done in Nepal on the evaluation of orthodontic treatment satisfaction after it has been completed. Aims: The goal of this study was to analyze patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment was completed. Settings and Design: In Private Dental Clinics in Kathmandu, Nepal, 115 patients who had finished their orthodontic treatment within a year of the research’s inception were the subjects of this descriptive cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: The patient was called over the phone for a follow-up examination. At the time of follow-up, the data was collected from them by a self-administered questionnaire. Statistical Analysis Used: The degree of satisfaction was measured using descriptive statistics, such as frequencies, percentages, and the Likert 5-point scale. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the levels of satisfaction between males and females, as well as across age groups (15–25 years) and those beyond 25 years after orthodontic treatment had finished. Results: The degree of satisfaction of patients was excellent regarding the behavior of the orthodontist. In terms of patient satisfaction, there was no discernible difference between patients of either gender. The degree of satisfaction with the orthodontist’s behavior varied significantly across patients in the age groups of 15–25 years and those above 25 years. Conclusion: The level of patient satisfaction following the completion of orthodontic treatment will aid in service improvement, planning, and organization, leading to high-quality care.