Background The overall poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer is related to late clinical detection. Early diagnosis remains a considerable challenge in pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, the onset of clinical symptoms in patients usually indicate advanced disease or presence of metastasis. Analysis and Results Currently, there are no designated diagnostic or screening tests for pancreatic cancer in clinical use. Thus, identifying risk groups, preclinical risk factors or surveillance strategies to facilitate early detection is a target for ongoing research. Hereditary genetic syndromes are a obvious, but small group at risk, and warrants close surveillance as suggested by society guidelines. Screening for pancreatic cancer in asymptomatic individuals is currently associated with the risk of false positive tests and, thus, risk of harms that outweigh benefits. The promise of cancer biomarkers and use of ‘omics’ technology (genomic, transcriptomics, metabolomics etc.) has yet to see a clinical breakthrough. Several proposed biomarker studies for early cancer detection lack external validation or, when externally validated, have shown considerably lower accuracy than in the original data. Biopsies or tissues are often taken at the time of diagnosis in research studies, hence invalidating the value of a time-dependent lag of the biomarker to detect a pre-clinical, asymptomatic yet operable cancer. New technologies will be essential for early diagnosis, with emerging data from image-based radiomics approaches, artificial intelligence and machine learning suggesting avenues for improved detection. Conclusions Early detection may come from analytics of various body fluids (eg ‘liquid biopsies’ from blood or urine). In this review we present some the technological platforms that are explored for their ability to detect pancreatic cancer, some of which may eventually change the prospects and outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Background We retrospectively aimed to assess the prognostic significance of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) standardized uptake value (SUVmaxsstr), SSTR representative tumor volume (RTVsstr) and total lesion SSTR expression (TLsstr) obtained by [68Ga]Ga-edotreotide PET/CT ([68Ga]Ga-SSTR PET/CT) in patients with primary gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) before surgery. Material and Methods We analyzed patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-SSTR PET/CT 3-6 weeks before surgery from February 2020 to April 2022. The mean SUVmaxsstr value, the RTVsstr (cm3; 42% threshold) and the TLsstr (g) were registered. Thereafter the patients were followed up 10.3 months (range 3-27). The PET/CT results were compared to the event free survival (EFS). Results Forty-two patients (61 ± 13 years) have been enrolled. At multivariate analysis only RTVsstr values were predictive. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for RTVsstr showed a significant better EFS in patients presenting lower values as compared to those having greater ( P = .003, log-rank test). SUVmaxsstr was not suitable for predicting EFS, TLsstr mildly. Conclusion RTVsstr represents a valuable volumetric parameter able to predict the outcome in GEP-NET patients who underwent surgery. The magnitude of the SSTR representative tumor burden holds a predominant value for determining the response to therapy in GEP-NET patients before surgery, rather than the maximal SSTR representation at single voxel.

Background Technetium-99m-labeled Tilmanocept, a multivalent mannose, is readily internalized by the CD206 surface receptor on macrophages and dendritic cells which are abundantly present in lymph nodes. We want to examine the drainage patterns of Technetium-99m-labeled Tilmanocept to sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in melanoma patients following the 10% rule. Methods Multi-center retrospective review of patients with cutaneous melanoma undergoing SLN biopsy using Technetium-99m-labeled Tilmanocept between 2008 and 2014 was conducted. Statistical methods were used for data analyses. Results Of the 564 patients (mean age of 60.3 and 62% male) with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showing at least one SLN, several primary tumor sites were included: 27% head/neck, 33% trunk, 21% upper extremity and 19% lower extremity. For the head/neck primary site, 36.5% of patients had multiple draining basins; for the trunk site, 36.4% of patients; for the upper extremity site, 13% of patients; and for the lower extremity, 27.4% of patients. A median of 3 (range 1-18) SLNs were identified and resected. Overall, 78% of patients had >1 SLN identified by Technetium-99m-labeled Tilmanocept. In a multivariate model, patients with >1 SLN were significantly associated with age, Breslow depth, tumor location and higher AJCC tumor stage. A total of 17.7% of patients (100/564) had a positive SLN identified. A total of 145 positive SLNs were identified out of 1,812 SLNs with a positive SLN rate of 8%. Positive SLN status was significantly associated with younger age, greater Breslow depth, mitosis rate, higher AJCC tumor stage, presence of ulceration and angiolymphatic invasion. Conclusions Using the 10% rule, Technetium-99m-labeled Tilmanocept detects multiple SLNs in most melanoma patients.

Vascular resections involving the superior mesenteric and portal veins (SMV-PV), celiac axis (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and hepatic artery (HA) have multiplied in recent years, raising the resection rate for pancreatic cancer (PDAC) and the related morbidity and mortality rates. While resection is generally accepted for resectable SMV-PV, the usefulness of associated arterial resection in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally-advanced PDAC (LAPC) is much debated. Careful selection of splenic vein reconstruction is very important to prevent left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH). During distal pancreatectomy (DP), CA and common HA resection is largely accepted, while there is debate on the value of SMA and proper HA resection and reconstruction. Their resection is useless according to several reviews and meta-analyses, and some international societies, although some high-volume centers have reported good results. Short- and long-term reconstructed vessel patency varies with the type of reconstruction, the material used, and the surgeon’s experience. Laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and DP are generally accepted if done by surgeons performing at least 10 such procedures annually. The usefulness of associated vascular resection remains highly controversial. Surgeons need to complete numerous minimally-invasive procedures to overcome the learning curve, and prevent an increase in complications and surgical mortality. Higher resectability rates and satisfactory long-term results have been reported after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for BRPC and LAPC requiring vascular resection. It is essential to select the most appropriate NAT for a given patient and to assess PDAC resectability preoperatively.

Background An older age contributes to the development of bladder cancer. However, the relationship between advanced age at the diagnosis and prognosis of bladder cancer has been few reported. This study aimed to determine the effect of age on survival in bladder cancer with different subgroups. Methods 117,275 patients with bladder cancer, identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during 2004-2015 in America, were divided into 4 age groups (≤54, 55 to 64, 65 to 74, and ≥75 years). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model and competing risk model were conducted according to different age groups. Heat maps were plotted to show the impact of age on survival in subgroups classified by other clinicopathological variables. Moreover, restricted cubic spline was used to model the association between age and the risk of death. Results Patients aged ≥75 years had shorter overall survival in comparison with those aged ≤54 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.13-5.59). Compared with patients aged ≤54 years, patients older than 75 years experienced a decreased rate of bladder cancer-specific survival (subdistribution HR = 2.15, 95% CI = 2.04-2.25). Heat maps also showed that older ages were associated with worse overall cumulative mortality and bladder cancer-specific cumulative mortality. Similarly, restricted cubic spline verified the impact of age on survival of bladder cancer. Conclusions Age at diagnosis of bladder cancer was found to be a significant predictor for the worse overall survival and bladder cancer-specific survival even in an era with more effective therapies. Exploring the reasons why older age contributes to poor outcomes for bladder cancer will be the focus of future research.

Objectives Among advanced multiple myeloma (MM) patients, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) specific targets like Belantamab Mafodotin (belamaf) and CAR T-cell therapies have been shown to improve clinical outcomes, but at significant costs. To compare the expected costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained among a hypothetical cohort of triple refractory MM patients treated with one of three BCMA-directed therapies: (1) idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), (2) ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), and (3) belamaf for up to 20 months. Methods In this cost-effectiveness analysis, we built a Monte Carlo Markov Chain microsimulation model using estimates and parameters from the evidence on MM treatment for 10 000 hypothetical patients between the ages for 40 and 80. We assigned expected years of life remaining and made varying assumptions about survival beyond 5 years Results We predicted total cost of treatment for CAR-T therapy to be six times greater than for belamaf, but the QALYs gained from treatment are 6 to 8 times greater. Ide-cel was weakly dominated by cilta-cel and our base-case incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing cilta-cel with belamaf was $109,497 per QALY gained, averaging $123,618 in probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Conclusions These findings hinge on the assumption of longer-term survival but suggest that the use of CAR-T therapy is approaching standard ICER thresholds.

Background Multimorbidity is a concern for people living with cancer, as over 90% have at least one other condition. Multimorbidity complicates care coming from multiple providers who work within separate, siloed systems. Information describing high-risk and high-cost disease combinations has potential to improve the experience, outcome, and overall cost of care by informing comprehensive care management frameworks. This study aimed to identify disease combinations among people with cancer and other conditions, and to assess the health burden associated with those combinations to help healthcare providers more effectively prioritize and coordinate care. Methods We used a population-based retrospective cohort design including adults with a cancer diagnosis between March-2003 and April-2013, followed-up until March 2018. We used observed disease combinations defined by level of multimorbidity and partitive (k-means) clusters, ie groupings of similar diseases based on the prevalence of each condition. We assessed disease combination-associated health burden through health service utilization, including emergency department visits, primary care visits and hospital admissions during the follow-up period. Results 549,248 adults were included in the study. Anxiety, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and osteoarthritis co-occurred with cancer 1.1 to 5.3 times more often than expected by chance. Disease combinations varied by cancer type and age but were similar between sexes. The largest partitive cluster included cancer and anxiety, with at least 25% of individuals also having osteoarthritis. Cancer also tended to co-occur with hypertension (8.0%) or osteoarthritis (6.2%). There were differences between clusters in healthcare utilization, regardless of the number of disease combinations or clustering approach used. Conclusion Researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and other stakeholders can use the clustering information presented here to improve the healthcare system for people with cancer multimorbidity by developing cluster-specific care management and clinical guidelines for common disease combinations.

Object Focus on immune-related gene pairs (IRGPs) and develop a prognostic model to predict the prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods First, the LUAD patient dataset was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, and paired analysis of immune-related genes was subsequently conducted. Then, LASSO regression was used to screen prognostic IRGPs for building a risk prediction model. Meanwhile, the Gene Expression Omnibus database was used for external validation of the model. Next, the clinical predictive power of IRGPs features was assessed by uni-multivariate Cox regression analysis, the infiltration of key immune cells in high and low IRGPs risk groups was analyzed with CIBERSORT, quanTIseq, and Timer, and the key pathways enriched for IRGPs were assessed using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Finally, the expression and related functions of key immune cells and genes were verified by immunofluorescence and cell experiments of tissue samples. Results It was revealed that the risk score of 19 IRGPs could be used as accurate indicators to evaluate the prognosis of LUAD patients, and the risk score was mainly related to T cell infiltration based on CIBERSORT analysis. Two genes of IRGPs, IL6, and CCL2, were found to be closely associated with the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 and the function of T-cells. Depending on the results of tissue immunofluorescence, IL6, CCL2, and T cells were highly expressed in the LUAD tissues of patients. Furthermore, IL6 and CCL2 were positively correlated with the expression of T cells. Besides, qRT-PCR assay in four different LUAD cells proved that IL6 and CCL2 were positively correlated with the expression of PD-L1 (P < .001). Conclusions Based on 19 IRGPs, an effective prognosis model was established to predict the prognosis of LUAD patients. In addition, IL6 and CCL2 are closely related to the function of T-cells.

Purpose Treatment options for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are commonly limited for patients with advanced age due to medical comorbidities and/or poor performance status. These patients may not be candidates for more aggressive chemotherapy regimens and/or surgical resection leaving few, if any, other effective treatments. Ablative stereotactic MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy (A-SMART) is both efficacious and safe for PDAC and can achieve excellent long-term local control, however, the appropriateness of A-SMART for elderly patients with inoperable PDAC is not well understood. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of inoperable non-metastatic PDAC patients aged 75 years or older treated on the MRIdian Linac at 2 institutions. Clinical outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional (LRC). Toxicity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v5). Results A total of 49 patients were evaluated with a median age of 81 years (range, 75-91) and a median follow-up of 14 months from diagnosis. PDAC was classified as locally advanced (46.9%), borderline resectable (36.7%), or medically inoperable (16.3%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 84% of patients and all received A-SMART to a median 50 Gy (range, 40-50 Gy) in 5 fractions. 1 Year LRC, PFS, and OS were 88.9%, 53.8%, and 78.9%, respectively. Nine patients (18%) had resection after A-SMART and benefited from PFS improvement (26 vs 6 months, P = .01). ECOG PS <2 was the only predictor of improved OS on multivariate analysis. Acute and late grade 3 + toxicity rates were 8.2% and 4.1%, respectively. Conclusions A-SMART is associated with encouraging LRC and OS in elderly patients with initially inoperable PDAC. This novel non-invasive treatment strategy appears to be well-tolerated in patients with advanced age and should be considered in this population that has limited treatment options.

Purpose This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis of neutropenia caused by chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods Patients with breast cancer who received long- or short-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis of neutropenia were enrolled in this study, and incidences of neutropenia were compared between two groups. A decision-analytic and a Markov model were used to compare the health benefits and costs of utilizing long- vs short-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as the primary prophylaxis from the perspective of the Chinese health service system. Subsequently, one-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated in baseline and sensitivity analyses. Results Patients receiving long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as the primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia experienced a significant lower incidence of this adverse event, compared with the short-acting one for 2 to 7 days. The outcomes of baseline analysis indicated that long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor had a gain of 0.08 quality-adjusted life years and costed $149 more than the short-acting one, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1792 per quality-adjusted life year. The sensitivity analysis proved the stability of our models and economic efficiency of long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Conclusions Patients receiving long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis of neutropenia experienced lower risk of this event compared with those underusing short-acting one. The long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor may be a more cost-effective strategy for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia than short-acting one, considering the Chinese willingness-to-pay threshold of $12158.6 per quality-adjusted life year.

Background The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) have been reported as prognostic markers for various cancers. We evaluated the prognostic value of the NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, SIRI, and OPNI for poorly-to moderately-differentiated cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 109 patients with early-stage poorly-to moderately-differentiated CSCC who underwent radical surgery at our institution in 2014-2017. The optimal cutoff points for the NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, SIRI, and OPNI were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. Overall survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed a multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model to determine the independent prognostic indicators for early-stage poorly-to moderately-differentiated CSCC. Results The appropriate cutoff points were: NLR, 1.72; PLR, 111.96; MLR, .24; SII, 566.23; SIRI, 1.38; and OPNI, 52.68. The OS of the patients with a high OPNI ( P = .04), low SII ( P = .03), or low SIRI ( P = .01) was significantly better. The uni- and multivariate analyses identified only the OPNI as an independent prognostic marker for early-stage poorly-to moderately-differentiated CSCC ( P = .04 and P = .02). Conclusion The OPNI is an independent prognostic marker for early-stage poorly-to moderately-differentiated CSCC; the NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI are not.

Introduction Plexiform neurofibromas (PN) represent the main cause of morbidity in patients affected by Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1). Until recently, surgery has been the main treatment option in these patients, but it is burdened with a low efficacy rate and a high incidence of side effects as well as recurrence. In recent years, MEK inhibitors (MEKi) such as selumetinib and trametinib have shown great promise. Methods We retrospectively describe a single center cohort of NF1 patients affected by PN1 and treated with MEKi since 2019 to 2021. Patients recruited in the study were affected by PN that were not eligible to complete surgical excision, symptomatic or with major cosmetic deformation or functional neurological deficits. Results Most patients experienced improvement in clinical symptoms and quality of life, with reduction or stabilization of lesions. However, no complete response was achieved. The most common adverse effects involved the skin, affecting every patient. Importantly, no life-threatening adverse effects occurred. Conclusions In our experience, MEKi treatment has been shown to be both safe and effective in improving symptomatology and quality of life.

Objective In this article on adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of salivary gland, we intend to summarize the causes of misdiagnosis and oversight of ACC hoping to improve cytological diagnostic accuracy, clinical management and patient treatment. Methods The study retrospectively reviewed 32 patients with ACC of salivary gland, registered at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from July 2014 to June 2021. These cases were diagnosed by FNA and surgical excision biopsy. All cytopathological results were retrospectively categorized according to Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC). The accuracy of FNA was verified by surgical excision biopsy. Results Of these 32 patients, 16 (50.0%) cases were male, and 16 (50.0%) were female. Their age ranged from 21 to 79 years, with an average age of 50.32 years. The highest incidence (15/32, 46.9%) of ACC was observed in patients between 41 and 50 years of age. 10 cases (31.3%) occurred in the parotid gland, 9 cases (28.1%) in the submandibular gland, 9 cases (28.1%) in the sublingual gland, 3 cases (9.4%) in the palate, and 1 case (3.1%) in the lip. Among the 32 cases of ACC, 23 cases (71.9%) were classified to VI, 4 cases (12.5%) to IVa, and 5 cases (15.6%) to II by MSRSGC. A comparison of the FNA results with biopsy showed that the accuracy of FNA in ACC of salivary gland is 71.9%. Being able to identify the cytomorphological features is the key factor for accurate diagnosis of ACC of the salivary gland. Conclusion Our results confirm that FNA is an important initial screening in the diagnosis of ACC of salivary gland. Increased study of the cytomorphology of ACC is beneficial for more accurate diagnosis of ACC, to reduce misdiagnosis and oversight.

Introduction The role of primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA) treated with FOLFIRINOX is unknown. We aimed to compare the frequencies of grades 3 or 4 neutropenia (G3/4N) and febrile neutropenia (FN) and survival outcomes according to the use of PP. Methods This is a retrospective study. We included patients with pathologically confirmed MPA treated with FOLFIRINOX in first-line. Patients who received primary prophylaxis (PP group) were compared to patients who received secondary or no G-CSF (no-PP group). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the standard Cox proportional hazard model. To account for potential biases, we performed sensitivity analyses excluding patients who received secondary prophilaxis and treating G-CSF as a time-dependent covariate in extended Cox proportional hazard models. Results The study population consisted of 123 patients. PP was used by 75 patients (61.0%). G3/4 N occurred more frequently among patients without PP (10.7 vs 41.7%; P < .001). There was no difference in the frequency of FN between groups (5.3 vs 8.3%; P = .710). In multivariate analysis, PP was associated with a trend toward improved OS (HR = .66; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] .41 - 1.07; P = .094). In the multivariate model excluding patients with secondary prophylaxis (HR = .54; 95% CI 0.32 - .91; P = .022) and in the time-dependent model (HR = .47; 95% CI 0.28 - .80; P = .005), PP was associated with statistically superior OS. Conclusions Despite the reduction in the frequency of G3/4N, the risk of FN among patients treated with FOLFIRINOX without G-CSF is too low to justify its use in a routine basis. However, given the potential of G-CSF to improve survival in this setting, further studies are warranted to assess its role during treatment with FOLFIRINOX for patients with MPA.

Background We aimed to investigate the determinant factors of anti-PD-1 therapy outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods In this retrospective study, we included 64 patients with recurrent/metastatic NPC. The association of patients’ characteristics, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) with survival benefit of anti-PD-1 therapy were analyzed using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Patients were divided based on the median value of CRP, NLR or LDH into different subgroups. Results At a median follow-up time of 11.4 months (range: 1-28 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.9 months (95% CI, .18-3.6) and 15 months (95% CI, 10.9-19.1) months, respectively. Pretreatment metastases numbers was significant predictor of PFS (HR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.10-3.63; P = .024) and OS (HR = 2.77; 95% CI 1.36-5.61; P = .005). Baseline LDH level was independent predictor of OS (HR = 7.01; 95% CI 3.09-15.88; P < .001). Patients with LDH level >435 U/L at the baseline had significantly shorter PFS and OS compared to patients with LDH level ≤435 U/L (median PFS: 1.7 vs 3.5 months, P = .040; median OS: 3.7 vs 18.5 months, P < .001). Patients with non-durable clinical benefit (NDB) had significantly higher LDH level at the baseline compared to patients who achieved durable clinical benefit (DCB) ( P = .025). Post-treatment levels of CRP, LDH, and NLR were decreased compared to baseline in patients with DCB ( P = .030, P = .088, and P = .066, respectively), whereas, there was a significant increase in post-treatment level of LDH compared with baseline in patients with NDB ( P = .024). Conclusions LDH level at the baseline was an independent predictor of OS and pretreatment metastases numbers was a significant predictor of PFS and OS.

Introduction Devastating cancer-related events are not uncommon, and these events have weakened communication performance and induced stress among health care providers (HCPs), particularly physicians. This study aimed to investigate the perspective of HCPs emotionally affected by poor clinical outcomes due to the failure of cancer therapy. Methods A cross-sectional, online survey was conducted over 3 months among HCPs practicing in the field of oncology in Saudi Arabia, comprising physicians, pharmacists, and nurses. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26.0. A P -value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results This study demonstrated a positive correlation between HCPs’ length of experience and emotional impact of treatment failure, albeit this was not statistically significant (P = .071). Analysis of their perspective toward failure of cancer therapies revealed a significant impact of occupation and sex (P = .014 and P = .047, respectively). Moreover, occupation played a significant role in shaping the viewpoint of HCPs toward the need for conducing further research to test the appropriateness of treatment protocols on local patients (P = .022). Despite the emotional responses of HCPs to suboptimal clinical outcomes, factors such as work burnout, lack of concentration and patience, work or personal problems, and under appreciation were frequently identified as triggers of such outcomes. Conclusion Our results revealed that poor clinical outcomes observed among cancer patients are emotional triggers for HCPs practicing in the oncology field. The emotional response is often perceived negatively, and can potentially lead to a decline in the quality of care provided to these patients.

It has been over four decades since the launch of the National Cancer Control Programme in India, yet the cancer screening rates for oral cancer remain unremarkable. Moreover, India is bracing a large burden of oral cancer with poor survival rates. An effective public health programme implementation relies on a multitude of factors related to cost-effective evidence-based interventions, the healthcare delivery system, public health human resource management, community behaviour, partnership with stakeholders, identifying opportunities and political commitment. In this context, we discuss the various challenges in the early detection of oral premalignant and malignant lesions and potential solutions.

Background Patients with cancer frequently reported sleep problems during their treatments which can affect their sleep quality have an impact on patients’ quality of life (QOL). Objective to assess the prevalence of sleep quality and associated factors in adult cancer patients on treatment in the Oncology unit of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2021 Methods institutional-based cross-sectional study design was used and data was collected by using face-to-face structured interview questionnaires from March 1 to April 1, 2021. Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) consisted of 19 items, the social support scale (OSS-3) consisted of 3 items, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) consisted of 14 items were applied. Logistic regression including bivariate and multivariate analysis was done to examine the association between dependent and independent variables, and P< 0.05 was considered the level of significance for associations. Results A total of 264 sampled adult cancer patients on treatments were included in this study, with a response rate of 93.61%. About 26.5% of the participants’ age distribution was between 40 to 49 years, and 68.6% were female. 59.8% of the study participants were married. Concerning education, about 48.9% of participants attended primary and secondary school and 45% of participants were unemployed. Overall, 53.79% of individuals had poor sleep quality. Low income ((AOR=5.36 CI 95% (2.23, 12.90), fatigue (AOR=2.89 CI 95(1.32, 6.33), pain (AOR 3.82 C I95 % (1.84, 7.93), poor of social support (AOR =3.20 CI 95% (1.43, 6.74), anxiety (AOR=3.48 CI 95% (1.44, 8.38) and depression (AOR 2.87 CI 95 % (1.05-7.391) were all associated with poor sleep quality. Conclusion This study revealed a high prevalence of poor sleep quality, which was significantly associated with factors like low income, fatigue, pain, poor social support, anxiety, and depression among cancer patients on treatments.

Introduction The 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for prostate cancer genetic testing expanded access to genetic services. Few studies have examined how this change has affected provider practice outside of large cancer centers. Methods We conducted a qualitative study of multi-disciplinary health care providers treating patients with prostate cancer at a safety-net hospital. Participants completed an interview that addressed knowledge, practices, and contextual factors related to providing genetic services to patients with prostate cancer. A thematic analysis using both inductive and deductive coding was undertaken. Results Seventeen providers completed interviews. Challenges in identifying eligible patients for genetic testing stemmed from a lack of a) systems that facilitate routine patient identification, and b) readily available family history data for eligibility determination. Providers identified non-medical patient characteristics that influenced their referral process, including health literacy, language, cultural beliefs, patient distress, and cost. Providers who see patients at different times along the cancer care continuum viewed benefits of testing differently. Conclusion The use of digital technologies that systematically identify those eligible for genetic testing referrals may mitigate some but not all challenges identified in this study. Further research should determine how individual provider perceptions influence referral practices and patient access to genetics both within and across cancer specialties.

Purpose To identify prognostic factors of survival and recurrence in advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing radical surgery and HIPEC. Methods In a single Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, and over a 16-year period, from a total of 274 epithelial ovarian cancer patients, retrospectively, we identified 152 patients undergoing complete (CC-0) or near-complete (CC-1) cytoreduction, including at least one colonic resection, and HIPEC. Results Mean age of patients was 58.8 years and CC-0 was possible in 72.4%. Rates of in-hospital mortality and major morbidity were 2.6% and 15.7%. Only 122 (80.3%) patients completed Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy (ASCH). Rates of metastatic Total Lymph Nodes (TLN), Para-Aortic and Pelvic Lymph Nodes (PAPLN) and Large Bowel Lymph Nodes (LBLN) were 58.7%, 58.5%, and 51.3%, respectively. Median, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 39 months, 43%, and 36.2%, respectively. The recurrence rate was 35.5%. On univariate analysis, CC-1, high Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), in-hospital morbidity, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were adverse factors for survival and recurrence. On multivariate analysis, negative survival indicators were the advanced age of patients, extensive peritoneal dissemination, low total number of TLN and no systemic PAPLN. Metastatic LBLN and segmental resection of the small bowel (SIR) were associated with a high risk for recurrence. Conclusion CC-O is feasible in most advanced ovarian cancer patients and HIPEC may confer a survival benefit. Radical bowel resection, with its entire mesocolon, may be necessary, as its lymph nodes often harbor metastases influencing disease recurrence and survival. The role of metastatic bowel lymph nodes has to be taken into account when assessing the impact of systemic lymphadenectomy in this group of patients.

Background COVID-19 forced a delay of non-essential health services, including lung cancer screening. Our institution developed a single-encounter, telemedicine (SET) lung cancer screening whereby patients receive low-dose CT in-person, but counseling regarding results, coordination of follow-up care and smoking cessation is delivered using telemedicine. This study compares outcomes of SET lung cancer screening to our pre-COVID, single-visit, in-person (SIP) lung cancer screening. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed we recorded independent variables of gender, race/ethnicity, age, educational attainment, smoking status and dependent variables including cancer diagnosis, stage and treatment between March 2019 to July 2021. Using retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes of SIP lung cancer screening before COVID-19 and SET lung cancer screening amid COVID-19. Results There was a significant difference in number of patients screened pre- and amid COVID-19.673 people were screened via SIP, while only 440 were screened via SET. SIP screening consisted of 52.5% Black/African American patients, which decreased to 37% with SET lung cancer screening. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or educational attainment. There was also no significant difference in Lung–RADS score between the 2 methods of screening or diagnostic procedures performed. Ultimately telemedicine based screening diagnosed fewer cancers, 1.6% diagnosed via telemedicine vs 3.3% screened by in person. Conclusion We implemented SET lung cancer screening to continue lung cancer screening during a global pandemic. Our study established feasibility of telemedicine-based lung cancer screening among our predominantly African American/Black population, though fewer patients were screened. We found no difference in distribution between age, or educational attainment suggesting other factors discouraging lung cancer screening amid COVID-19.

Background Mixed neuroendocrine and non-endocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are challenging to diagnose and manage clinically. The current understanding of MiNENs’ pathobiology, molecular mechanisms, and management is incomplete. Though microsatellite instability (MSI) is known to impact carcinogenesis, reports examining MSI mechanisms for MiNENs are rare. Methods We report an unusual colonic MSI-MiNEN uncovered in an 89-year-old woman and the review of the literature. Results Pathologic inspection revealed a high-grade carcinoma composed of tumor cells with neuroendocrine histologic traits and immunophenotype intermixed with mucin-containing signet ring–like cells arranged in nested and micronodular patterns. Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 mismatch repair proteins was detected in tumor cells. INSM1 immunostaining highlighted about 50% of the tumour, further reinforcing the MiNEN diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing identified multiple carcinogenic mutations. Because of the advanced stage of the tumor and its adhesion to the adjacent organs, surgical resection was aborted; immunotherapy was initiated. The tumor is in remission 30 months following initiation of treatment, and the patient remains asymptomatic. Conclusion This unique MSI MiNEN was characterized by its immunohistochemical and molecular signatures and illustrated how correctly diagnosing MSI can strongly improve a patient’s outcomes.

Purpose The aim of the current study was to identify the relationship between body composition changes during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and the treatment efficiency of NAT in gastrointestinal cancer (GC) patients. Methods From January 2015 to July 2020, 277 GC patients treated with NAT had included for retrospective analysis. The body mass index (BMI) and computed tomography (CT) imaging before and after NAT were recorded. The BMI change optimal cut-off value were calculated by ROC curve. Balancing essential characteristic variables using propensity score matching (PSM) method. Exploring the association between BMI changes and tumor response to NAT using logistic regression analysis. The survival outcome of matched patients between different BMI change groups was compared. Results A cutoff point of BMI change >2% during NAT was defined as BMI loss. Among the 277 patients, 110 (39.7%) patients showed BMI change with a loss after NAT. In total, 71 pairs of patients were selected for further analysis. The median follow-up time was 22 months (range 3 to 63 months). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses in matched cohort showed that BMI change was a prognostic factor for tumor response after NAT in GC patients (odds ratio (OR), .471; 95% confidence interval (CI), .233-.953; P = .036). In addition, patients who experienced BMI loss after NAT showed worse overall survival than those who had BMI gain or stable. Conclusion BMI loss during NAT probably may has negative effects on NAT efficiency and survival for gastrointestinal cancer patients. It is necessary to monitor and maintain weight for patients during treatment.

Objective: This study sought to determine the mean prognostic usefulness of seleniumphosphate synthase ( SEPHS1) by investigating its expression in 33 human malignancies and its relationship to tumor immunity. Methods: The expression of selenophosphate synthase 1 ( SEPHS1) in 33 human malignant tumors was examined using the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and TIMER databases. Furthermore, the TCGA cohort was used to investigate relationships between SEPHS1 and immunological checkpoint genes (ICGs), tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and DNA mismatch repair genes (MMRs). To establish independent risk factors and calculate survival probabilities for liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and brain lower-grade glioma (LGG), Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized. Eventually, the Genomics of Cancer Drug Sensitivity (GDSC) database was used to evaluate the drug sensitivity in LGG and LIHC patients with high SEPHS1 expression. Results: Overall, in numerous tumor tissues, SEPHS1 was highly expressed, and it significantly linked with the prognosis of LGG, ACC, and LIHC ( P < .05). Furthermore, in numerous cancers, SEPHS1 expression was linked to tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs), TMB, MSI, and MMRs. According to univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, SEPHS1 expression was significant for patients with LGG and LIHC. Conclusion: High SEPHS1 expression has a better prognosis for LGG, while low SEPHS1 expression has a better prognosis for LIHC. Chemotherapy was advised for LGG patients, particularly for those with high SEPHS1 expression because it can predict how responsive patients will be to 5-Fluorouracil and Temozolomide. This interaction between SEPHS1 and chemoradiotherapy has a positive clinical impact and may be used as evidence for chemotherapy for LGG and LIHC patients.