Очистить фильтр
Найдено 327
Скопировать ссылку
По релевантности По дате По цитируемости По SJR
25 50 100 200
Public values in the socio-technical construction of autonomous vehicle futures
Soh E., Martens K.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2023, цитирований: 3, Обзор, doi.org
Be prepared! Local politicians’ proclivity for local government adaptive capacity building in response to COVID-19: the role of risk perceptions
Desmidt S., Meyfroodt K.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2023, цитирований: 5, Обзор, doi.org
The new era leadership for the public sector? Entrepreneurship, effectiveness, and democracy
Vivona R.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2023, цитирований: 14, Обзор, doi.org
Can’t buy me love? An experiment on the relationship between federal grant spending and public approval of federal agencies
Shay L.P., Byers J.S.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2023, цитирований: 1, Обзор, doi.org
Bureaucrat or artificial intelligence: people’s preferences and perceptions of government service
Gaozhao D., Wright J.E., Gainey M.K.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2023, цитирований: 19, Обзор, doi.org
Who are leading? A survey of organizational context explaining leadership behaviour of managers and non-managerial employees in public organizations
van der Hoek M., Kuipers B.S.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 6, Обзор, doi.org
Citizen perceptions of public school efficiency: evidence from the U.S.
Brunner E.J., Robbins M.D., Simonsen B.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 9, Обзор, doi.org
Death anxiety among street-level bureaucrats: how does it affect their work drive and performance?
Ogbonnaya C., Ali M., Usman M., Babalola M.T., Ren S., Rofcanin Y.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 8, Обзор, doi.org
What makes work smart in the public sector? Insights from a bibliometric analysis and interpretive literature review
Palumbo R., Fakhar Manesh M., Petrolo D.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 14, Обзор, doi.org
The importance of effectiveness versus transparency and stakeholder involvement in citizens’ perception of public sector algorithms
König P.D., Felfeli J., Achtziger A., Wenzelburger G.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 8, Обзор, doi.org
Collaborators, supplementers, purchasers and privatizers - profiling the social and health care delivery forms of finnish municipalities through cluster analysis
Kauppi K., Taponen S.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 3, Обзор, doi.org
HRM autonomy, integration and performance in government agencies: tests of necessity and sufficiency
Blom R., Voorn B., Borst R.T.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 11, Обзор, doi.org
Relationships matter: how workplace social capital affects absenteeism of public sector employees
Pihl-Thingvad S., Winter V., Schelde Hansen M., Willems J.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 5, Обзор, doi.org
Spreading information or engaging the public? The German police’s communication on Twitter
Jungblut M., Jungblut J.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 4, Обзор, doi.org
Talent management in public science funding organizations: institutional logics, paradoxical tensions and HR actor responses
McCarthy A., Garavan T., Holland D., Bohle Carbonell K., Virtanen T., O Kane P., Van Wart M.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 3, Обзор, doi.org
Preconditions of coordination in regional public organizations
Davoudi S., Johnson M.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 2, Обзор, doi.org
Resource dependence and the survival of government-created social enterprises
Andrews R., Hodgkinson I.R.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 6, Обзор, doi.org
User-orientation in public service organizations: making use of value as a thick concept
Danielsson P., Westrup U.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 2, Обзор, doi.org
Creating public value in regional policy. Bringing citizens back in
Mendez C., Pegan A., Triga V.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 7, Обзор, doi.org
The tripod of trust: a multilevel approach to trust-based leadership in public organizations
Bentzen T.Ø.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 11, Обзор, doi.org
Doing better with less: do behavioural capabilities affect street level bureaucrats’ ability to deliver public value?
Brunetto Y., Xerri M., Farr-Wharton B.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 12, Обзор, doi.org
Transitioning to network governance in the social services sector: the blending and segregating mechanisms in the hybridization process
Chan C.H.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 1, Обзор, doi.org
Active representation and identity taxation: unintended outcome of representative labour?
Johnston K., Yarrow E.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 3, Обзор, doi.org
Unpacking the accountability cube and its relationship with blame avoidance
Tu W.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 5, Обзор, doi.org
Public leadership to foster peacebuilding in violently divided societies
Khalil L., Hartley J.
Q1
Taylor & Francis
Public Management Review, 2022, цитирований: 9, Обзор, doi.org
Cobalt Бета
ru en